AN ANALYSIS OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL IMPLEMENTATION IN ENGLISH READING TEXTBOOK FOR THE FIFTH GRADERS OF MALAYSIAN PRIMARY SCHOOL

Ahmad Ruhin Hidayat

Abstract


 

Higher order thinking skill has become an interesting issue in educational terms including in Malaysia. Currently, teaching English in Malaysia is using a textbook as the main source. Reading is one of the skills which is known as a complex skill because it is well related to higher order thinking. The three higher levels of the cognitive domain in Bloom’s revised taxonomy are analysis (C4), evaluation (C5), and creation (C6). The objectives of the research are to know the types and the most frequent use of higher order thinking skill found in reading essay exercises of English textbook for the fifth graders of Malaysian Primary school. The study focuses on the cognitive  process of the cognitive domain in Bloom’s revised taxonomy. The type of research is descriptive qualitative research. The technique of collecting data in this research is documentation technique. The writer finds that the distribution of higher order thinking skill is higher than the lower order thinking skill but it is still unequal between one domain to other domains. It needs improvement to make the distributions of the cognitive domain more balance.

 


Keywords


HOTS; Bloom's revised taxonomy; textbook analysis; reading exercises

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. HandbookI: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The Textbooks as Agent of Change. ELT Journal, 48 (04), 315-28.

Krathwohl, D. (2002). Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (04), 212-218

Lee, Poh Lin. Nirmala, Siti Shalikhah (2014). English Year 5 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

McDavitt, D. S. (1993). Teaching for Understanding: Attaining Higher Order Learning and Increasing Achievement through Experimental Instruction. Unpublished Thesis: Retrieved from: http://www.eric.ed.gov.

Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J.2Qualitative Data Analysis : a Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.

Musial, D., Nieminen, G., Thomas, J., & Burke, K. (2009). Foundations of Meaningful Educational Assessment. New York: McGraw Hill.

Nuttal, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in Foreign Language. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Petress, K. (2005). Questions and Answers: the Substance of Knowledge and Relationship. College Student Journal, 374-376.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v2i1.377

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, Language, and Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.