PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN OF SPEAKING ACTIVITY IN THE ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR MALAYSIAN PRIMARY SCHOOL GRADE 4

Zaqy Mubarok

Abstract


English speaking skill is one of the English skills that is taught in classroom. It deals with human interaction, communication, and connection. Based on the observation in one of the primary schools in Malaysia, the researcher notes some problems in the English learning. There are students’ motivation, overuse of the students in using their native language (Malay), and the students’ dependence on the teacher. Since speaking is a psychomotor skill, psychomotor domain needs to be focused more without ignoring the other domains. This research aims to reveal the types of psychomotor domain used in speaking activity in the English textbook, and to investigate the most dominant type of psychomotor domain used in speaking activity in the English textbook. The type of this research is qualitative research. The researcher implements descriptive qualitative content analysis as the research design. The subject of this research is the speaking learning materials in the English textbook for Malaysia primary school students grade four entitled “English year 4”. The process of analysing data uses the data analysis table of psychomotor domain by Moore (2001).


Keywords


Psychomotor Domain, Speaking, English Textbook, Malaysia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. London: Longsman, Green and Co Ltd.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assesment Principles and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

Dave, R. H. (1970). Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. Tucson: Educational Innovators Press.

Fitri, Y. A. (2015). The Implementation of Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Assessment at the Tenth Grade of SMA N 1 Solok Selatan. Skripsi. 3-4. STKIP PGRI Sumbar, Padang.

Hapsari, I. A. (2017). A Content Analysis of “When English Rings A Bell” English Textbook in 2013 Curriculum for the Seventh Grade Student of Junior High School Published by Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Skripsi. The State Islamic Institute of Surakarta, English Education Department, Surakarta.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Pearson Longman.

Hill, C. F. (2018, April). Psychomotor Skills for the 21st Century: What should students learn?. Article. Retrieved November, 5, 2018, from www.curriculumredesign.org.

Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia. English Year 4 Sekolah Kebangsaan. DBP: Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia

Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Petaksiran Bahasa Inggeris SK Tahun Empat. Malaysia: Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Mawadah, A. (2018). The Analysis of English Textbook for Malaysian First Graders and Its Cultural Representation. Skripsi. Tidar University, English Department, Magelang

Micklich, D. L. (2011). Examining the Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Dimensions in Management Skill Development through Experiential Learning: Developing A Framework. Journal. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, volume 38, 261-264. Illinois: Illinois State University.

Moore, K. D. (2001). Classroom Teaching Skills 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-hill.

Mubarok, A. A. (2017). Students’ Perspective: The Impact Preview Towards Learner Autonomy in EFL Learning Process. Proceeding. LLTC, 274. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.

Mubarok, Z. (2017). Students' Perspective: is Teacher Still Important in TELE Class?. Proceeding. ELLiC, 289-291. Semarang: Semarang Muhammadiyah University.

Naz, B. A. (2009, July 23). Presentation on Instructional Objectives. 2-8. Article. Retrieved December, 12, 2018, from https://eric.ed.gov/.

Ni’mah, M. (2017). Psychomotor Domain in Speaking Performance Assesment of English Teaching at SMPN 24 Surabaya. Skripsi. Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, English Teacher Education Department, Surabaya.

Nirmawati, L. A. (2015). Improving Students’ Speaking Skills through Speaking Board Games of Grade VIII of SMP N 13 Yogyakarta in the Academic Year of 2013/2014. Skripsi. Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta.

O’Neill, F. M. (2010, January 20). Guide to Taxonomies of Learning. Article. Retrieved December, 13, 2018, from www.ucd.ie/teaching.

Oktaviani, F. N. (2018). Cognitive Domain of English Textbook for Grade 5 Elementary School in Malaysia. Skripsi. Tidar University, English Department, Magelang.

Pollack, D. (2016, May 6). Dave's Psychomotor Domain Taxonomy Cheat Sheet. Article. Retrieved December 24, 2018, from www.cheatography.com.

Rahma, F. I. (2013). An Analysis of the English Textbook for Junior High School VII Based on Content Standard of BSNP. Skripsi. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, School of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2015). Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Satriawan, Z. M. (2017). Teacher’s Role in 21st Century Through the Use of Technology in TELE Class. Proceeding. CLLT, 587-588. Magelang: Tidar University.

Seong, L. P. (2013). English Year 4 Sekolah Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Sukarno. (2010). Introduction to Linguistics. Magelang: Yuma Pustaka Press.

Sulistyani, D. S. (2017). An Analysis of the English Textbook “Learning More English 2” for the Eighth Grade of MTS N Surakarta 1 in the 2015/2016 Academic Year. Skripsi. State Islamic Institute of Surakarta, Surakarta.

Suryani, L. (2015). The Effectiveness of Role Play in Teaching Speaking. Journal. ELTIN journal, Volume 3/II, 106. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi.

Thomas, K. (2004). Learning Taxonomies in the Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Domains. Article. 8-14. Retrieved December, 17, 2018, from www.rockymountainalchemy.com.

Ubi, I. E. (2014). The Power and Purpose of Instructional Objectives in Social Studies Education. Journal. Journal of Education and Practice, 150. Calabar: University of Calabar.

Wood. (2009). In J. C. Richards, Key Issues in Language Teaching (p. 324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wulansari, D. (2013). A Descriptive Study an Teaching Speaking Method to the Seventh Year Student of SMP Negeri 3 Baturetno. Skripsi. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, School of Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta.

Yousefkhani, M. (2008). Impact of Instructional Objectives on e/learning Materials. Proceeding. WCE, 1-2. London: IAENG.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v2i1.375

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, Language, and Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.