COGNITIVE DOMAIN OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR GRADE 5 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN MALAYSIA

fadlilah nurul oktaviani

Abstract


One of the aspects that is implemented in the textbook is cognitive skill which deals with intellectual or thinking ability and guide the students to have knowledges and be active in the classroom. This paper focuses on identifying the type and most dominant cognitive domain reflected in textbook and aims to know the type and find out the most dominant cognitive domain. The type of this paper is qualitative research and the research design is descriptive qualitative. The subject is English textbook for five graders of elementary school entitled “English Year 5” which is published by Malaysia ministry of education with KSSR (Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah) year 5 as the curriculum. The researcher analyzed the instructional activities based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy by Anderson (2001). The result reveals that the total number of the instructional activities is 235. The type of cognitive domain is creating with 71, understanding is 55,  remembering shows 41, applying shows 34, analyzing shows 20 and the last domain is evaluating that has 14. Creating, the most cognitive domain shows that the authors want the students be able to put elements together to form a coherent or functional whole, that is reorganizing elements into a new pattern to communicate relate their ideas accurately means the authors facilitate students to create ideas in order to communicate to other people. The authors use communicative approach to write the textbook that its guides the teachers and students to become more active, communicative and collaborative in the class.


Keywords


Cognitive domain taxonomy, Words, Instructional activities, Types of Cognitives

Full Text:

PDF

References


http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/p21stateimp_curriculuminstruction.pdf. Download: Friday, January 19th, 2018 at 22.41.

Anderson & Krathwohl. (2000). Anderson and Krathwohl taxonomy . OPAR 2012. Retrieved from http://languageacademy.utm.my/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Bloom-Taxonomy.pdf. retrieved, January 19th at 22.00.

Anderson, Lorin W. Kratwohl, David R. Airasian, Peter W. et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision on Bloom's Taxonomy of Educationa; Objectives. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Bloom,B., Englehart,M.Furst,E.,Hill,W., & Krathwohl.D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.

Garinger, D. (2002). Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Eric Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics.

Gronlund, N.E. (2003). Assessment of students acgievement (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Boston.

Gronlund, N.E. (2004). Writing instructional objectives for teaching and assessment (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Pearson.

Hei,X.J. (2017). Thingking Skills in the 12th Grade English Course book in Timor Leste. THINGKING SKILLS IN THE ENGLISH COURSE BOOK. Beyond Words Vol.5 No.1. May 2017. Page 32-45.

Henson, K.T. (2003). Curriculum Planning (2nd ed.). IL: Waveland Press.

Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia. English Year 5 Sekolah Kebangsaan. DBP: Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Petaksiran Bahasa Inggeris SK Tahun Lima. Malaysia: Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Krathwohl,D.R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy an Overview. Theory into Practice, volume 41,nn 4, auntumn 2002.

Mayer, R.E. (2001). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice,41 (4), 226-232.

McMilan,J.H. (2004). Classroom Assessment : Principal and practice for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Richards, Jack. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Walser, Nancy. (2008). Teaching 21st Century Skills. Harvard Education Letters.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v1i2.258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, Language, and Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.