DISCRIMINATION INDEX OF TEST ITEM IN ENGLISH MID YEAR TESTOF FOURTH GRADERS OF SEKOLAH KEBANGSAAN BANDAR SUNGAI BUAYAIN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2017

Authors

  • Yoan Natalia Matahelumual
  • Dwi Winarsih
  • Lilia Indriani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v1i1.195

Keywords:

English Language Testing, Discrimination Index

Abstract

In teaching English, teachers use the test to evaluate or assess the students progress and understanding.  In this case, sometimes the teacher writes the English test items beyond the students’ ability and understanding. That is why students get confused with the test items. Therefore, the writer is interested in analyzing the discrimination index of the English mid year test items at SekolahKebangsaan Bandar Sungai Buaya, Selangor Malaysia in order to know the test given by the teacher. The objective of this research is to  describe the discrimination index of English mid year test for the fourth graders of SekolahKebangsaan Bandar Sungai Buaya, Selangor Malaysia. The subject of this research is the English mid year test of the fourth graders of Utarid Class in Sekolah Kebangsaan Bandar Sungai Buaya, Selangor Malaysia in the school year 2017 and consist of 24 students. In conducting this research, the writer took the questions sheet and the students’ answer sheet  of English mid year test  for the fourth graders of Sekolah Kebangsaan Bandar Sungai Buaya in the school year 2017. According to data analysis, the writer summed up the conclusions as follows. Based on Naga’s Discrimination Index Parameter (1992) there are four test items are rejected because the discrimination index score is 0.00. It means that those four test cannot disriminate the students who who have already mastered  the material and those who have  not.

References

Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Aggarwal, Y.P.1986. Statistical Methods, Concepts, Applications and Computations. New Delhi: Sterling Publication.

Airisian, Peter W. and Michael K. Russel.2008.Classroom Asssessment.New York: Beth Mejia.

Alismail, Halah Ahmed and Dr. Patrick McGuire.2015.21 st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice.Colorado: Department Curriculum and Instruction

Boopathiraj, C..2013.Analysis of test items on difficulty level and discrimination index in the test for research in education. Puducherry: Pondicherry University.

Brown, H. Douglas.2003. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices.California: Longman.

Etistika, Yuni Wijaya and DwiAgus Sudjimat.2013. Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Global. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Fernandes, H.J.X.1984.Testing and Measurement.Jakarta:Nasional Education Planning.

Gronlund, Norman E. and Robert L Linn.1995.Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, Seventhedition.London: Merrill.

Haryono.2016. Teknologi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Abad 21. Semarang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Hingrojo, Mozaffer Rahim and Farhan Jaleel.2012.Analysis of One-Best MCQs: the Difficulty Index, Discrimination Index and Distractor Efficiency. Pakistan: Fatima Jinnah Dental College.

Naga, D. S. 1992. Pengantar Teori Sekor pada Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma.

Ross, Dave.2017. What We Knoe about 4Cs.http://www.p21.org/news-events/p21blog/2293-what-we-know-about-the-4cs.(December 4th, 2017)

SK Bandar Sungai Buaya.2017.Peperiksaan Pertengahan tahun 2017 Tahun 4.

Selangor. Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Sudijono. 2001. PsikologiPendidikan. Jakarta: CV Rajawali

Ur, Penny.1996.A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

http://www.catforms.com/pages/Item-Formats-%26-Standards.html. Download: accesed on Sunday, November 5th, 2017 at 8.50.

http://www.p21.org/pages/21st-Century-Curriculum.html. Download: accesed on Wednesday, November 8th, 2017 at 12.22.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-30