DESKRIPSI PEMAHAMAN MULTIREPRESENTASI KIMIA PADA MATERI REDOKS DAN ELEKTROKIMIA KELAS XII

Authors

  • Irvan Hidayat Departemen Kimia, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Latisna Dj Departemen Kimia, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v5i2.2771

Keywords:

Redoks dan Elektrokimia, Multirepresentasi Kimia, Representasi, Redox and Electrochemistry, Chemical Multirepresentation, Representation

Abstract

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pemahaman multirepresentasi kimia siswa pada materi Redoks dan Elektrokimia kelas XII MAN 2 Kota Padang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif.  Subjek penelitian ini adalah kelas XII IPA 4 MAN 2 Kota Padang yang diambil secara acak dengan beranggotakan 35 orang siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes uraian dan wawancara, soal yang diberikan mencakup 3 level representasi dengan teknis analisis data Miles & Huberman serta pengolahan data dengan Microsoft Excel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persentase pemahaman level makroskopik sebesar 65% (kategori cukup), level simbolik sebesar 62% (kategori cukup), dan level submikroskopik sebesar 20% (kategori sangat kurang).

 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to describe students' understanding of multi-representation of chemistry in Redox and Electrochemistry material for class XII MAN 2 Padang City. This type of research is a quantitative descriptive research. The subject of this study was class XII IPA 4 MAN 2 Padang City which was taken randomly with 35 students as members. The instruments used were descriptive tests and interviews. The questions covered included 3 levels of representation using technical analysis data from Miles & Huberman and data processing using Microsoft Excel. The results showed that the proportion of understanding at the macroscopic level was 65% (enough category), the symbolic level was 62% (sufficient category), and the sub-microscopic level was 20% (very poor category).

References

Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains melalui Representasi Makroskopik-Mikroskopik-Simbolik. Jakarta; UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Ainsworth, S. 2006. The Function of Multiple Representation, Computers and Education, 33 (2-3), 131-152.

AL Chandrasegaran, et al. 2007. The development of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrumen for evaluating secondary school student’s ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,(3), 293-307. Department of Applied Chemistry, Australia: Curtin University Of Technology.

Arikunto, 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Astuti, 2009. Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Aktivitas Kelas dan Laboratorium Redoks dan Elektrokimia. Padang : UNP.

Atmowardoyo,H. 2018. Research Methods in TEFL Studies : Descriptive Research, Case Study, Error Analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,198.

Cook, M. 2008. The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Viewing and Interpreting Graphics With Macroscopic and Molecular Representation. Willey Interscience, 92, 848-867.

Gilbert, J.K & Treagust, D. 2009. Introduction : Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical. Dalam Gilbert, J.K Treagust, D (Ed), Multiple Representations in Chemical Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education (1-10). Wokingham: The University of Reading.

Handayani, 2015. Analisis Profil Model Mental Siswa Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1) 107-108.

Johnstone, A.H. 2000. Teaching of Chemistry Logical or Psychological. Chemical Education : Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 9-15.

Langitasari, I. 2016. Analisis Kemampuan Multilevel Representasi Mahasiswa Tingkat 1 Pada Konsep Redoks. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan. 1(1), 14-24.

LI, Winnie Sim Siew. 2014. “Application of Multiple Representation Levels in Redox Reactions Among Tenth Grade Chemistry Teachers.” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 36-37.

Nugraha, Ali. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Matematika dan Sains. Tangerang: Universitas Terbuka.

Sudaryono.2017. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yahya, 2014. Pendekatan, Jenis, dan Metode Pendidikan. Padang : UNP.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-20

Issue

Section

Articles