POLA ARGUMENTASI PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPA DI SMP NEGERI 13 BANJARMASIN (ARGUMENTATION PATTERN ON NATURAL SCIENCE LEARNING IN SMPN 13 BANJARMASIN)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v4i1.1846Keywords:
Argumentasi, Pembelajaran IPA, Analisis Toulmin.Abstract
Proses pembelajaran yang berkualitas tercipta apabila peserta didik dan guru berperan aktif di dalamnya. Berargumen merupakan salah satu bentuk keaktifan dalam proses pembelajaran di kelas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (1) Mendeskripsikan dan mengidentifikasi pola argumentasi peserta didik dalam pembelajaran IPA. (2) Mendeskripsikan peran guru dalam proses pembelajaran untuk memicu argumentasi dalam kelas. Pengumpulan data menggunakan pengamatan dan dokumentasi untuk memperoleh data argumentasi dalam kelas dengan menggunakan analisis argumen Toulmin. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pola argumentasi di kelas hanya mencapai pada pola 1. Peran guru masih belum bisa menggali kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik. Berdasarkan hasil penelititan diperoleh simpulan bahwa pola argumentasi dalam proses pembelajaran IPA hanya mencapai pada pola 1. Guru berperan memfasilitasi peserta didik selama proses belajar mengajar untuk memicu argumentasi dalam kelas.
References
Ahmadi, Abu, & Supatmo. 1991. Ilmu Alamiah Dasar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPing into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88(6), hlm. 915-933.
Gunawan, Iman. 2013. Metode Penelitiaan Kualitatif: Teori dan Pratilik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Inch, S.E.,& Warnick, B. (2006). Critical Thinking And Comunication ,the use of reason in argumen, Pearson Education.
Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory Exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), hlm. 2527-2558.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J. & Walker, J. P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95(2), hlm. 217-257.
Simon, S., Erduran, S. & Osborne, J. (2006). “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in The Science Classroom”. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), hlm. 235-260.
Subiyanto. 1988. Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuanm Alam. Jakarta: Depdikbud Dirjen Dikti Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Sumaji, dkk. 1998. Pendidikan Sains yang Humanistis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Suyono & Hariyanto, 2011. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Trianto. 2011. MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TERPADU konsep, strategi, dan implementasinya dalam kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who submit the manuscript hold almost all copyrights. However, the right of publication is transferred to Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education. The right includes the rights to publish their article for the first time and to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature. This is copyright transfer form (Download) that must be signed by the corresponding author. After Journal of Natural Science and Integration published the article, the authors have the right to deposit it or republish it.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:
Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
you are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
